Speaking by Ojelanki Ngwenyama

As community of scientific researchers within the IS discipline we are challenged to generate new knowledge and communicate our findings in a ways that advance our discipline and society at large. The challenge of conducting well grounded scientific research effectively arguing for our research findings is not trivial. As Popper (1954), Toulmin (1961), Habermas (1974) the project of generating scientific knowledge needs to continually interrogated, criticised and reformulated in every generation. In this presentation I will outline a set of principles and strategy for interrogating the validity claims scientific research in information systems.

Tuesday, April 24, 2012 - 12:30 to 13:00

Ojelanki Ngwenyama

 Institute for Innovation and Technology Management

 Ted Rogers School of Management

 Ryerson University, Toronto, Canada

As community of scientific researchers within the IS discipline we are challenged to generate new knowledge and communicate our findings in a ways that advance our discipline and society at large. The challenge of conducting well grounded scientific research effectively arguing for our research findings is not trivial. As Popper (1954), Toulmin (1961), Habermas (1974) the project of generating scientific knowledge needs to continually interrogated, criticised and reformulated in every generation.  In this presentation I will outline a set of principles and strategy for interrogating the validity claims scientific research in information systems. 

The page was last edited by: Communications // 04/23/2012